Emotional Intelligence Institute  
Monday, December 01, 2008
Preview or Begin Our Free On-line EQ Training Program
Designed to Teach You How to Get the Best Out of Life, Emotionally
Home About Us Support History Privacy Contact Site Map
7   Improving Speakers, Writers, Leaders EQ Back to Contents   Previous   Next   


7B Lesson - A Comprehensive Speaker Evaluation


This lesson reveals the need for guidelines in situations that suggest criticism would be helpful. Its check-list provides a broad picture of a number of specific evaluation criteria.

The more we practice sharpening our overall behavioral skills, the more it can help us strengthen the skills required while speaking and performing other behavioral tasks. This increased understanding and attention toward the quality of our behavior, thus, enhances our control of it in front of others who may be evaluating it while we are on a stage or in life, as well.

The progression we go through to improve our speaking skills is similar to the progression we go through to improve our overall behavior; learning to understand and practice skill enhancing criteria and avoid those known to be harmful or inappropriate.

Constructive Ways to Suggest Improvements
How many criticisms have you experienced or know of that distanced or dissolved personal and/or professional relationships? Criticism can have emotionally devastating impact. It can have ill effects on a person’s self-esteem, if not given with encouraging due care and taken in a healthy way.

When approaching a situation that suggests criticism would be helpful, quality self-leadership has its guidelines. It requires that we concern ourselves about being objective and yet clearly identifying and communicating our suggested change. Diplomacy tells us it is good practice to be cautious to not emotionally distance or totally alienate the person or group being criticized. This is a healthful concern for us to have in most other life situations, as well; whether we are addressing issues with loved ones, casual friends, acquaintances, employees, employers, businesses or other associates we encounter.

It is just as important to structure a critique with a beginning, body, and closing as it is to do so in preparing a speech. If you are to evaluate a person’s speech or other behavior for suggested change, please consider the following guidelines:

Before the occasion or during the person’s speech, search to define a few positive general characteristics, actions, or other specifics worth complimenting. Speak or note some of these strengths to first use to open your evaluation. Then address in the body of your evaluation what you distinguish as awkward, inappropriate, or for some other reason grounds for improvement. After presenting the body of your evaluation, close by adding another uplifting encouraging statement or reemphasize the strength you mentioned in the beginning.

If you are to critique the person in front of an audience and think any particular points could be embarrassing to the individual, make arrangements to tell the person about those issues in private—and here again, it can be important to apply a meaningfully warm opening and closing. Below is a list of examples of the type of constructive phrases we suggest you begin your sentences with in the body of your critique:

  1. Something you might want to consider working on is ______________.
  2. What I’d like to see you improve upon is ________________________.
  3. With everything else you’ve done, I know you can ________________.
  4. If I had any suggestions, it would be ___________________________.
  5. One thing I think you could improve is __________________________.
  6. Another thing I would suggest considering is _____________________.
  7. A way that will bring your speech to the next level is ______________.
  8. What I thought was missing was _______________________________.
  9. If you ________________, it would add a lot of impact to your speech.
  10. I think you could really improve on ______________________________.
  11. Something I would like to see you consider is _____________________.
  12. To improve future speeches, you might want to practice ___________.


SPEAKER’S EVALUATION CHECK-LIST

This comprehensive check-list includes a number of components and specifics that help identify the overall big picture of what is involved in a speaker’s performance. We wouldn’t expect as many of these skills to be evaluated in a beginner’s speeches as we would an experienced speaker. It would be the same if we were to evaluate a beginner musician or novice in sport, etc. With increased knowledge and practice, the number of specific components evaluated increases.

Note: Although not the most important intent of this form, it can also be used as a speaker’s check-list. It can help remind a speaker of a number of important criteria to pay attention to as s/he is preparing and practicing his/her speech.

Name of person(s) being evaluated __________________________________________

Name of person doing evaluating (optional) ___________________________________

Speaker has asked evaluators to pay close attention to/or ask
_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor A. SPEAKER'S INTRODUCTION
How dynamically was the speaker introduced?
How well did the introductory points tie into the topic?
How well did the introductory points tie into the occasion?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor B. OPENING REMARKS
How catchy or interesting was the speech title?
How interesting or catchy was the opening?
How well did the opening flow into the body of the speech?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor C. CONTENT OF DELIVERY
How interesting were you in the topic?
How easy was it to follow the message?
How captivating was the message?
How content rich was the message?
How descriptive was the message?
How well-formed and related were the story illustrations?
How well were the points made about the subject?
How intrigued were you to hear more?
How well did the speech flow from one point to the next?
How well did the speaker project authority?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor D. CONTENT CREATIVITY
How well did the speaker tie into the season, holiday, event theme?
How well were surprising points positioned?
How clever were the points?
How related were the examples and metaphors?
How colorful was the language?
How appropriate was the speaker’s choice of humor?
How well was the humor placed?
How well was non-offensive humor employed?
How well positioned were exaggerations?
How well were questions presented?
How vivid were the descriptions and images?
How innovative was the presentation?
How effectively did the speaker__________ ?
How articulate was the speaker?
How dramatically effective was the presentation?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor E. CONTENT OF CLOSING
How well did the closing flow from the body of the speech?
How strong did the closing wrap up the speech?
How well did the closing tie into the title and opening of the speech?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor F. SENSITIVITY TOWARD AUDIENCE/OTHER SPEAKERS
How warmly did the speaker begin her/his speech?
How warmly did the speaker assure the audience of their importance?
How well did the speaker interact with the audience, overall?
How evenly did the speakers eye contact flow across the room?
How well did the speaker handle sensitive issues?
How effectively did the speaker pause for the audience to reflect?
How well paced was the speech to absorb and connect its content?
How timely did the speaker begin and end the message?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor G. VOICE PROJECTION
How well did the speaker project the volume of his/her voice?
How well did the speaker project the vocal variety of his/her voice?
How friendly was the speaker’s tone and demeanor?
How well did the speaker enunciate words?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor H. PRESENCE
How enthusiastic was the speaker’s manner?
How close did the speaker stay to the subject addressing?
How appropriately dressed was the speaker for this presentation?
How professional was the overall quality of the presentation?
How well poised, yet comfortable did the speaker seem to be?
How up-to-date was the speaker dressed—including glasses?
How effective was the speaker’s eye contact?
How subtly did the speaker use notes to remember his/her message?
How confident and in control did the speaker appear?
How well did the speech seem to be rehearsed?
How friendly was the speaker’s manner?
How knowledgeable did the speaker seem to be about the topic?
How would you grade the speaker’s appearance, overall?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor I. GESTURES
How well did the hand gestures fit the comments?
How well did the speaker use hand gestures, overall?
Did the speaker use animation and exaggerations where fitting?
How well did the body language tie into what speaker was saying?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor J. PROPS
How well were visuals sized for those in the back to see?
How professional did visuals look?
How familiar did the speaker seem to be with props?
How timely did the speaker display and remove props?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


Great Good Fair Poor K. OVERALL
How effective was the speech toward the objective?
How well did the topic fit the theme?
How well formed was the speech overall?
Other Comments ____________________________________________________


top